God's boundless love

I am offering my second book’s website for your reference as you review my blog posts which expand on the concordance I discuss between neuroscience and Scripture concerning dualist interactionism.

https://www.boundlessloveofgod.com

Stan Lennard
Dualist interaction between immaterial and material entities

In the previous blog posts and in those to come I am endeavoring to present current articles from neuroscience that demonstrate interaction between cognition and neural synaptic networks. Increasing evidence is compelling that the human mind is immaterial and that its cognitive activity interacts with the material elements of the human brain. I offer steps required for an immaterial thought or perception to become actualized within neural codes transmitted through synaptic networks of the human brain. Ultimately I hope to provide convincing evidence that personal interaction does occur between the Mind of God and the mind of Man through neural synaptic networks in our time.

Stan Lennard
Imagined touch by the mind

In an article published in 2021, the authors “recorded neurons within the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) of a human . . . participant during actual touch presentation and during a tactile imagery task” (https://doi.org/10.7554/eLilfe.61646). The results of the study showed that PPC neurons that are activated by physical touch are also activated “during a tactile imagery task in a body part-specific manner.” It is a novel finding that suggested “PPC involvement in the cognitive processing of touch [encoding]. . . . cognitive processing prior to active imagery as well as during imagery shares a neuronal substrate with actual touch.” Of particular interest is that the study participant was a tetraplegic in whom touch sensation was tested in insensate parts of the body. Actual touch in those parts was found to elicit no neuronal activation, but imagined touch did activate the known coherent neuronal pathways normally activated by direct touch. Activation was attributed to the cognitive mind through the PPC. The mechanism for the activation was not addressed, but there is accumulating evidence that activation could have been via waveforms generated by the cognitive mind and transmitted encoded through the PPC and its coherent synaptic networks. I propose that the immaterial mind of the study participant accounted for the interpretation of the neural codes as touch, a dualist interaction between immaterial and material entities.

Stan Lennard
God's omnipresence

I am offering verses from Psalm 139 that show concordance with points I have shared in my two books and blogs, that God has the power to “translate” neural codes that course through the synaptic networks of our brains as well as to generate them. He knows our thoughts.

You have searched me, Lord, and you know me….you perceive my thoughts from afar….Before a word is on my tongue you, Lord, know it completely….Where can I go from your Spirit? Where can I flee from your presence? If I go up to the heavens, you are there; if I make my bed in the depths, you are there….if I settle on the far side of the sea, even there your hand will guide me….For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.

Stan Lennard
Decoding thoughts of the human mind

STEPHANIE MARTIN AND COWORKERS PUBLISHED AN ARTICLE IN FRONTIERS IN NEUROENGINEERING, MAY 2014, VOL. 7, ENTITLED “DECODING SPECTROTEMPORAL FEATURES OF OVERT AND COVERT SPEECH FROM THE HUMAN CORTEX.” IN THEIR STUDY SUBJECTS READ THE SAME STORIES BOTH ALOUD AND SILENTLY, OVERT AND COVERT RESPECTIVELY. SPEECH IMAGERY IS INNER SPEECH, SILENT SPEECH, IMAGINED SPEECH, COVERT SPEECH, OR AUDITORY VERBAL IMAGERY. IT IS HAVING WORDS IN THE MIND. IT REFERS TO THE ABILITY TO “HEAR” SPEECH INTERNALLY WITHOUT THE INTENTIONAL MOVEMENT OF ANY BODY PARTS INVOLVED IN GENERATING AUDIBLE SPEECH. THE AUTHORS UTILIZED A METHOD TO “RECONSTRUCT OVERT AND COVERT SPEECH FROM DIRECT INTRACRANIAL RECORDINGS” TAKEN BY ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY. THEY FIRST BUILT A NEURAL DECODING MODEL FROM SELF-GENERATED OVERT SPEECH, AND THEN [EVALUATED] WHETHER THIS SAME MODEL COULD RECONSTRUCT SPEECH FEATURES IN THE COVERT SPEECH CONDITION.” THEY FOUND THAT “AUDITORY FEATURES OF COVERT SPEECH COULD BE DECODED FROM MODELS TRAINED FROM AN OVERT SPEECH CONDITION, PROVIDING EVIDENCE OF A SHARED NEURAL SUBSTRATE FOR OVERT AND COVERT SPEECH.” THOUGHTS WERE MAPPED TO BRAIN ACTIVITY IN THE FORM OF WAVEFORM TRACINGS THAT WERE DECODED SO THAT BRAIN ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY COULD BE TRANSLATED INTO UNDERSTANDABLE SPEECH. BUT THE PROCESS BY WHICH WAVEFORMS WERE GENERATED THAT WERE REFLECTED IN THE BRAIN TRACINGS WAS NOT ADDRESSED. AND JUST WHAT “HEARS” THE INTERNAL SPEECH? I OFFER THAT IT IS THE IMMATERIAL COGNITIVE MIND IN BOTH INSTANCES, BUT THE AUTHORS PROPOSED THAT “IMAGERY-RELATED BRAIN ACTIVATION COULD RESULT FROM TOP-DOWN INDUCTION MECHANISMS, INCLUDING MEMORY RETRIEVAL AND MOTOR STIMULATION.” THEIR PROPOSAL SUGGESTS A MATERIALIST REDUCTIONISM, ASSIGNING NO ROLE FOR THE IMMATERIAL COGNITIVE MIND.

THE AUTHORS TRANSLATED THE BRAIN TRACINGS USING THE MODEL THEY BUILT, AND IT IS AN ELEGANT STUDY THAT HOLDS ULTIMATE PROMISE FOR BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES THAT CAN MAKE COMMUNICATION POSSIBLE FOR PATIENTS UNABLE TO SPEAK BUT ABLE TO HAVE THOUGHTS. I PROPOSE THAT THEIR STUDY RESULTS POINT TO THE IMMATERIAL MIND AS THE “TRANSLATOR” OF LINGUISTIC NEURAL CODES GENERATED BY BOTH AUDIBLY PERCEIVED AND IMAGINED SPEECH. WE HAVE SEEN IN PREVIOUS BLOG POSTS AND IN MY BOOKS THAT WAVEFORMS ARE TRANSMITTED PROBABILISTICALLY VIA QUANTUM TUNNELING THROUGH POTENTIAL BARRIERS WITHIN SYNAPTIC COMPONENTS TO GENERATE SPIKE TRAINS OF ACTION POTENTIALS TRANSMITTING IN TURN LINGUISTIC NEURAL CODES THROUGH COHERENT SYNAPTIC NETWORKS WITH PURPOSE, SUCH AS TO TRANSMIT SPEECH. I OFFER THAT THE COGNITIVE MIND IS THE GENERATOR OF THE WAVEFORMS AND THE TRANSLATOR/INTERPRETER OF THE LINGUISTIC NEURAL CODES. THAT THE COGNITIVE MIND OF A HUMAN HAS THIS CAPACITY LEADS ONE TO DEDUCE THAT THE MIND OF GOD INDWELLING US AS THE HOLY SPIRIT ALSO HAS THE CAPACITY FOR DUALIST INTERACTION WITH THE MIND AND BRAIN OF MAN.

Stan Lennard
Jesus lives

Today a hymn I sang in my youth came to my mind, “He lives.” Over the past 20 years of my research into interaction between the Holy Spirit and the human spirit and soul I have sought concordance between Scripture and neuroscience concerning this blessed communion restored to repentant mankind by God’s grace. It was made possible by the sin sacrifice of Jesus Christ, resurrected and living. This hymn expresses the findings in song I have shared in my books and blogs. (Thanks to Alfred H. Ackley, 1887-1960)

I serve a risen Savior; He’s in the world today. I know that He is living, whatever men may say. I see His hand of mercy, I hear His voice of cheer. And just the time I need Him He’s always near.

He lives! He lives! Christ Jesus lives today! He walks with me and talks with me along life’s narrow way. He lives! He lives! Salvation to impart! You ask me how I know He lives? He lives within my heart.

In all the world around me I see His loving care. And though my heart grows weary I never will despair. I know that He is leading, thro’ all the stormy blast; The day of His appearing will come at last.

He lives! He lives! Christ Jesus lives today! He walks with me and talks with me along life’s narrow way. He lives! He lives! Salvation to impart! You ask me how I know He lives? He lives within my heart.

Rejoice, rejoice O Christian! Lift up your voice and sing eternal hallelujahs to Jesus Christ, the King! The Hope of all who seek Him, the Help of all who find, none other is so loving, so good and kind.

He lives! He lives! Christ Jesus lives today! He walks with me and talks with me along life’s narrow way. He lives! He lives! Salvation to impart! You ask me how I know He lives? He lives within my heart.

Stan Lennard
Visual mental imagery

Visual mental imagery refers to the perceptual experience of “seeing in the mind’s eye.” Mario Senden and coworkers published an article in 2019 that addressed the subjective correspondence known between imagined images and physical image perception and further showed that correspondence exists in their neural representations (https://dol.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01828-6). Visual “imagery-based reconstructions of letter shapes are recognizable [by fMRI] and preserve their physical geometry” in the visual cortex. Their results confirmed “that visual mental imagery preserves perceptual topographic organization” in the brain. Images of letters directly perceived by sight were generated via waveforms (photons) transmitted from the letters perceived and transmitted through the retina and optic nerve to the visual cortex. Of great interest in their study is that imagined letters were also detected in visual cortex by fMRI with the same “physical geometry” or topography. This finding suggests that mental imagery by the cognitive immaterial mind also generates waveforms that are transmitted through coherent neural networks to topographically corresponding visual cortex as neural codes. It is the cognitive mind that interprets the codes as perceived, or imagined, imagery. One can reason that the Mind of God has the power to stimulate neural networks to generate images as in dreams and visions?

Stan Lennard
Immaterial aspects of thought

In support of dualist interactionism I am identifying a lengthy article by Edward Feser that appeared in the American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 87, No. 1, 2013. Its title is “Kripke, Ross, and the Immaterial Aspects of Thought.” Feser cites comments by the materialist philosopher of mind, Jerry Fodor, who stated, “Lots of mental states are conscious, lots of mental states are intentional, and lots of mental processes are rational, and the question does rather suggest itself how anything that is material could be any of these.” One of the authors, the late James Ross, formulated a “powerful argument for the immateriality of our intellectual operations.” (His argument for the immateriality of the intellect was rooted in the Aristotelian-Scholastic tradition.) He identified a contrast between “the determinacy of thought and the indeterminacy of the physical.” Favoring the immateriality of thought is “the contrast between the universality of thought and the particularity of physical processes.” The determinacy of thought was considered by him to be immaterial.

Stan Lennard
Minds in communion, a reminder

Today in church the speaker emphasized our need to learn to hear the voice of God. I have shared that the indwelling of repentant mankind by the Holy Spirit is a reality today, a reality that did not end with the closure of the biblical Canon as some have believed. I have cited writings of authors who give instruction on how to hear from the Holy Spirit. I have drawn extensively from the literature of neuroscience to explain dualist interaction between the immaterial mind of Man and the material synaptic networks of the brain. Advances in the neurosciences are making dualist interactionism compelling as a process, so that we can be confident that indeed we can be in bidirectional personal communion with the Mind of God through His indwelling Holy Spirit. By the boundless love of God we are offered redemption with the renewal of our souls by the sin sacrifice paid by His Son, Jesus Christ. Upon His resurrection He sent the Holy Spirit as promised before his crucifixion, to live within us as Counselor and Helper. I will continue to post in my blogs findings from the neurosciences that address the “how” of dualist interaction between the Mind of God and the mind of Man. Thank you for your interest.

Stan Lennard
Waveform shape

In my blogs, especially the blog in three parts entitled “Waves in Our Brains,” I have shared how waveforms transmitted through the brain’s neural synaptic networks have amplitude, frequency and shape. Scott R. Cole and Bradley Voytek published an article in Trends in Cognitive Sciences entitled “Brain Oscillations and the Importance of Waveform Shape” (http://dx.dol.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.008) The authors shared that neural oscillations are assumed to have sinusoidal shapes, but in their article they showed “that there are numerous instances in which neural oscillations are nonsinusoidal.” They posit that these features “may provide crucial . . . physiological information related to neural communication, computation, and cognition.

It is remarkable, even inspiring, to realize how our Creator God established the capacity in the brains of humans to process semantic, specified information within neural codes learned over a lifetime, archived in memory and interpreted by the immaterial human mind, created in the Imago dei.

Stan Lennard