In an article published in October 2015 it was stated that the process of obtaining specific brain responses to different pixelized images in the primary visual cortex “is still unknown.” (Bing-Bing Guo et al, “Decoding Brain Responses to Pixelized Images in the Primary Visual Cortex: Implications for Visual Cortical Prostheses,” Neural Regeneration Research, Vol. 10.) However, specific brain activation patterns to pixelized images have been obtained above a chance level by the authors. They noted that “the relationship between visual space and cortical space is non-linear and non-conformal, so it is hard to accurately remap visual space onto cortical space.”
I offer the following question, drawing upon my previously posted blogs: Can pixelized images generate encoded waveforms wirelessly transmitted that can be “matched” with modular waveforms in the visual cortex established over a lifetime and archived in memory? If so, perhaps a synchronization of the waveforms could be achieved that would reflect the pixelized images sent to the cortical modular “detectors.” The cognitive mind of blind subjects would interpret the encoded waveforms as sight drawing upon encoded memory. If such a process would be possible it would map visual space to cortical space. There would be significant technological issues to address, but their resolution would involve the immaterial cognitive mind and its interaction with the material components of the visual cortex.
The last several posts have addressed the process by which visual spaces/images are mapped to visual cortical space of the brain so that one perceives given images. Attention has been given to a process to restore this function to sight-impaired individuals. It is a wonderful research activity that is drawing upon God’s created visual networks of the human brain. It is also my intention to suggest a process by which the Holy Spirit can instantiate neural codes directly into waveforms that are transmitted through synaptic networks to give visual information to cognitive minds.
Eduardo Fernandez and coworkers published an article in Frontiers in Neuroscience, Volume 14, August 2020, entitled “Toward Long-Term Communication with the Brain in the Blind by Intracortical Stimulation: Challenges and Future Prospects.” This very current article presents several important points that apply to interaction with neural synaptic pathways in vision. This remarkable technological application is very much in process, but to date indicates how investigators are applying some of the principles of dualist interaction to the needs of visually impaired patients. The possibility of restoring vision utilizing neural prosthetic devices is designed to bypass damaged visual pathways. We shall see that there is an absence of mention of cognitive perception by the immaterial mind, all physiological visual components reduced, it appears, to the workings of the brain itself. I will post several quotes from their article.
“All of the prosthetic devices work by exchanging information between the electronic [sensory] devices and different types of neurons. . . . several researchers are trying to develop visual prostheses designed to directly stimulate the brain. . . . a blind individual could use . . . artificially encoded neural information. . . . Although we see with the brain [the authors do not include visual perception by the immaterial cognitive mind by which neural codes are interpreted], the input information to the visual system begins at the eye, which catches and focuses light onto the retina. . . . The output neurons of the retina are the ganglion cells, which send their axons . . . through the optic nerve to the brain. This means that, in order to encode all the features of objects in the visual space . . . and the change of these features in time in the same way that the human retina does, we would need at least 1 million parallel channels. . . . Although ongoing studies suggest that electrical stimulation via multiple electrodes may give rise to useful vision . . . the device must be wireless [hence the role of the transmission of wave forms between a sensor replacing the retina where encoding begins and the neural components of the visual cortex]. . . . a key issue for the future success of cortical visual implants is related to how the brain understands artificially encoded information. [Again, no mention is made of the cognitive interpretation of neural codes by the immaterial mind.] . . . We should try to develop specific strategies to communicate with the brain of the blind in order to increase the chances of extracting useful information from the artificially encoded stimulation.”
This is exciting research, giving great promise to the visually impaired! In reading these quotations and my own comments it is my hope that one can appreciate the awesome intelligent design by our Creator God of the human visual sense! The principal question, in my view, is how encoded stimuli sent wirelessly to implanted intracortical microelectrodes will interface with neural memory codes established over a lifetime and archived in memory in the parts of the brain that function in vision. It is a daunting challenge!
I have shared what has been learned about the mechanism of synaptic transmission in my books and blog posts over the last four years. I will discuss an exciting article by Richard A. Normann and his coworkers entitled “Toward the Development of a Cortically Based Visual Neuroprosthesis” that was published in J Neurol Eng, June, 2009. The authors were motivated by the success of cochlear implants in restoring auditory capacity. The goal of their research is the creation of a visual neuroprosthesis designed to interface with the occipital cortex to restore a “useful sense of vision” in blind patients. I quote from their article, “Because retinal degeneration does not appear to spread to the neurons of the higher visual centers, a cortical approach for a visual prosthesis could provide an interventional site for virtually all forms of retinal blindness, trauma to the retinal and optic nerve, and blindness necessitated by precortical surgical procedures.”
In synaptic transmission we have seen that spike trains of action potentials carry linguistically encoded patterns of specified information instantiated within wave forms that, by quantum tunneling, are transmitted through synapses to stimulate postsynaptic action potentials that transmit the neural codes within spike trains to end points to bring about specific actions. There are both material and immaterial components to this elaborate process of dualist interaction. It is a created, designed process that provides for personal interaction between human cognitive minds and with the Mind of God through His indwelling Holy Spirit.
Let us examine the process being developed by the authors of this article and seek analogies with transmission within human synaptic networks. I quote:
“A cortical visual prosthesis, like other proposed approaches to sight restoration, would consist of a video camera [analogous with the retina], concealed in a pair of eyeglasses that generates a video data stream [spike trains of action potentials encoded with linguistic specified information] which captures the visual scene in front of the subject. This video data stream is then transformed and processed by a bioinspired retinal-like encoder [analogous to the generation of meaning and purpose within linguistic neural codes of spike trains]. This encoder would remap visual space onto cortical space and adjust the stimulus levels delivered to the implanted cortical electrodes. The digital data stream would then be transmitted wirelessly [via wave forms] to a number of electrode arrays implanted in the subject’s visual cortex [analogous to cortical modules whereby incoming wave forms transmitting neurally encoded, specified information within spike trains of action potentials are matched with wave forms within specific cortical modules to generate synchronous wave forms that are transmitted through synaptic networks with direction and purpose.]” The authors continue, “The processed digital data stream would produce a two-dimensional spatio-temporal pattern of electrical currents [analogous with encoded spike trains of action potentials] that would be injected into the cortical tissues [synaptic network endpoints within the cortex] via the implanted electrode arrays, and a two-dimension visual percept would be created in the subject [analogous to the interpretation by the cognitive mind of the meaning and purpose within the transmitted linguistic neural codes].”
I highly recommend this article to interested readers. I conclude with the following quotation from their article: “The goal of developing such a bioinspired retinal encoder is not to simply record a high-resolution image, but to transmit visual information in a meaningful way to the appropriate site(s) in the brain. Hence, the question of how the information about the external world is compressed in the retina and how this compressed representation is encoded into spike trains is of seminal importance. . . . The encoder/stimulator takes into account the irregular distribution of photoreceptors within the human retina and is able to encode the visual information in a way that is similar to the output of real retinal ganglion cells. Thus, the continuously varying input video steam is converted into neuromorphic pulse-coded signals through a circuit that emulates the function of retinal neurons.”
How human investigators are applying directly or indirectly what has been learned about synaptic network transmission to “bioinspired” medical devices is exciting and promising and reflects the awesome intelligence and design of our Creator God!
Aquiles Parodi and Jin-Woo Choi published an article in Electronics in 2019, Volume 8, p. 1344, that relates to the current consideration of waveform effects on neural stimulation. It is entitled, “A Pulse Generation Circuit for Studying Waveform Effects on Neurostimulation.” I am including a number of excerpts from their article:
“Electrical stimulation has demonstrated capabilities to alter the compound action potentials and long-term potentiation behavior of complex neural networks, even at low stimulation intensities, via an effect termed neuromodulation. Neuromodulation has been observed at all levels, from individual nerve cells to brain regions, including the synapses. . . . This effect is thought to arise from action potentials (APs) that are modulated as they propagate through individual nerve cells, depending on the nerve cell’s properties at the level of the soma, axon, and transmembrane proteins. This modulation can be enhanced or inhibited with neurostimulation. . . . Stimulation waveforms have been studied for their effects in neurostimulation. These include square or rectangular, exponential, ramp, sinusoidal, triangle and Gaussian waveforms.” These authors focused in their studies on the effects of signal shape on neurostimulation and have observed that “waveform shape has an effect on electrical stimulation outcome.”
Aspects of neural activity influenced by stimulation, in this case waveforms, have been addressed in both my books and in more recently posted blog posts on my website. I have presented preliminary evidence in previous blog posts that the immaterial, cognitive mind of humans has the capacity to generate waveforms that interact with the material components of the brain’s synaptic networks. The role of quantum tunneling has been included in these discussions, along with the recently defined potential role of quantum potential energy coupled with kinetic and potential energy in synaptic transmission. I repeat my proposal that the process of quantum tunneling constitutes the “non-material energy” identified by investigators such as William Dembski.
I am copying a lengthy excerpt from this article to show the complexity behind the generation of spike trains of action potentials and synaptic transmission that carry encoded information to effect various actions. It is our Creator God who designed these complex features with the ultimate Purpose of establishing intimate, personal communion with the crown of His creation, Man, by the power of His Holy Spirit. It is this dualist interaction that has been the focus of my own research.
“Design of stimulation waveforms is difficult, due to the diverse options and requirements for each anatomical stimulation target, the undetermined long-term effects of neurostimulation, the diversity of tissue, organ, and patient-level reactions, the unknown neural mechanisms involved [the focus of my studies], and the unknown side effects of stimulation methodology, including electrode type. The parameters of electrical stimulation waveforms, such as the amplitude, width and frequency of stimulation, have been shown to affect prosthetic sensory information in the vestibular nerve, the rate of excitation of individual nerves and nerve bundles, and the spatial selectivity within the bundles. Additionally, differences in stimulation waveforms, the polarity of current and direction, electric field shape and direction, and the temporal pattern of stimulation have been shown to have effects on the outcome of stimulation.”
We serve and worship an awesome God!
Warren M. Grill has studied the effects of stimulation waveform on the energy efficiency of neural excitation. His objective is to “understand the biophysical mechanisms underlying the effects of extracellular stimulation on neurons.” [This has been the focus of my own studies over the last 20 years, addressed in my two books and in blog posts on my website.] He continues stating that “Two important considerations when selecting or designing stimulation parameters are selectivity and efficiency. Selectivity is the ability to activate the targeted neural elements without activating the non-target neural elements. . . . Efficiency is achieving the required level of neural activation or response to achieve clinical efficacy with the minimal amount of stimulation. . . . The selectivity and efficiency of neural stimulation are dependent on the choice of the stimulation waveform.”
We see that multiple variables must be considered by the researchers to study biophysical mechanisms that exert effects on neuron stimulation. Our Creator God controls all these variables being uncovered over time by investigators to interact with the human spirit and soul! It is my judgment that God is allowing these kinds of studies to reveal to us how He communes with us! I continue:
Grill has learned that “the stimulation waveform shape can also be manipulated to increase stimulation selectivity between activation of the targeted neural elements and activation of non-target neural elements, and thereby increase the dynamic range between therapeutic effects and unwanted side effects [to the ultimate benefit of Man!] . . . . the energy required for stimulation is indeed dependent on the shape of the stimulation waveform, and highlight the importance of using an appropriately complex model to analyze the effects of waveform shape on neural excitation. . . . [there is an] optimal waveform for a particular application.”
In his concluding remarks Grill states that “the parameter space for electrical stimulation of the nervous system is extremely large, and the design and selection of stimulation parameters to achieve a desired response is a challenging problem” [giving testimony to the infinite power and intellect of our Creator God who designed these parameters for His purposes to achieve His desired responses in us!].
In previous blog posts I have cited research activities in the neurosciences that increasingly show how waveforms stimulate spike trains of action potentials that transmit encoded, specified information. Though not definitive, the data presented makes a compelling case for dualist interaction between the immaterial cognitive mind and the material neural synaptic networks of the human brain.
I am finding recent articles presenting the data of researchers in such departments as biomedical engineering that are remarkably similar in design and outcome to that being learned by neuroscientists operative within neural synaptic networks. In my next post I shall present the findings of Warren M. Grill whose article is entitled “Model-Based Analysis and Design of Waveforms for Efficient Neural Stimulation.”
In previous blogs I have shared how wave forms are involved in stimulating action potentials and that they transmit neurally encoded specified information. The nonmaterial energy has been identified as being possibly the quantum tunneling process by which synaptic transmission occurs through synchronous, coherent networks.
I now refer to excerpts from an article by Aquiles Parodi and Jin-Woo Choi entitled, “A Pulse Generation Circuit for Studying Waveform Effects on Neurostimulation.” It was published on November 14, 2019, in Electronics, Vol. 8. These will substantiate the proposals I have made that the immaterial mind, including the Mind of God, generate wave forms that stimulate spike trains of action potentials that transmit encoded specified information to bring about desired actions and purposes.
“Electrical stimulation parameters, such as waveform, amplitude, and stimulation frequency, have been shown to affect neurostimulation properties. . . . Electrical stimulation has demonstrated capabilities to alter the compound action potentials and long-term potentiation behavior of complex neural networks . . . . Neuromodulation has been observed at all levels, from individual nerve cells to brain regions, including the synapses. . . . waveform shape has an effect on electrical stimulation outcome.”
The authors refer to “the unknown neural mechanisms involved,” and this has been the subject of my research over the last 20 years, employing the neural synapse as the model for my studies of dualist interactionism. I will add additional posts that address how wave forms interact with neural synaptic networks. I will continue to search for work that addresses the generation of wave forms by the immaterial cognitive mind in addition to those I have referenced in previous blog posts.
When you open my blog site on “Minds in Communion” you will see two blogs composed by Don Olson, a fellow Christian apologist. The blog dated August 2nd precedes that posted on August 5th, but they are one unit. Please scroll down to the one dated August 2nd for your first reading, then to that posted on August 5th, the manuscript. It is long and very much worth the full read to learn how one experiences the Person of the Holy Spirit.
Stan Lennard
Introduction
In 2011-2012, I taught an Adult Formation Class on the Holy Spirit at Harbor Covenant Church. I gathered material for the class not only from numerous books and DVDs, but also from testimonies I requested from a large sample of fellow Christians on their experiences with the Holy Spirit and how He worked in their lives. On most Sundays, the classroom was packed with people which conveyed the message to me that Christians are hungry to learn about the Holy Spirit and how He works in their lives. For this reason, now in Oct., 2013 I decided to put the text of the class into a booklet and make it available to others.
Prompted By the Spirit
I’d like to start by describing the process that led me to a decision to teach a Sunday School class on the Holy Spirit. It was a struggle to come to this decision and I believe the struggle involved the Holy Spirit. There was nothing extraordinary about my experience – I think it’s a common experience for Christians who have a difficult decision to make and they call upon God through prayer for guidance and listen for His voice.
Ever since I became a Christian, the Holy Spirit has been on my mind and in my heart. I see the importance of the Holy Spirit to Christianity as right up there with the resurrection. Paul stressed the importance of the resurrection in 1 Cor. 15:14, “And, if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith”.
Without the resurrection, there would be no Christianity. And, without the Holy Spirit, there would be no Christianity. Without Pentecost, the Christian church would probably not have gotten started, or would have fizzled. Without the presence of Holy Spirit at Harbor Covenant, our church would be little more than a social club. The Holy Spirit gave us God’s Word and He helps us understand the truth revealed in the Word. He bears witness to Jesus. He enables us to know God. He is our helper, comforter, teacher, guide and advocate. He empowers us, He transforms us. So, I saw the Holy Spirit as being essential to Christianity and for us to live and be as Jesus wants us to.
So, just as we want to know as much as possible about a person we want to have a close relationship with, I as a Christian have always wanted to know as much as possible about the Holy Spirit, who He is, what is His nature, how in practice does He work in our lives. When He dwells within us, how does that look, how does it feel, what should the experience be like? So, all of the years I have been at HCC, I have hoped that an Adult Formation class would be offered on the Holy Spirit. But none appeared. I had hoped that a sermon or two would be preached on the Holy Spirit, and that didn’t happen until 2011 when Pastor Michael preached a sermon series on the Holy Spirit. I didn’t miss one of them. As a member of the Adult Christian Formation Committee, I pushed for a class on the Holy Spirit. The committee agreed, knowing that there were many at HCC who also thought a class on the Holy Spirit would be great. However, we could not find anyone who felt called to teach a class. Then a little voice within me started to speak, saying, “why don’t you step up yourself and teach it?” That’s when the struggle began. Another voice popped up and told me not to risk it. It told me that to teach about the Holy Spirit you must have some experience with the Spirit, and you haven’t been a Christian long enough to have sufficient experience to talk about the Spirit. You are spiritually immature and there would be many in the class much more spiritually mature here who would ask, “what can this Christian babe-in-the-woods tell me about the Holy Spirit that I don’t already know”. Furthermore, the voice told me, you are a scientist and not a theologian, so you will be out of your element. You don’t have a good enough command of Scripture to teach this subject. To make a long story short, this struggle went on for quite a while, and during that time it grew in my heart to give this class a try.
On the positive side, the original voice reminded me of the passion I had for teaching this class. The voice also said that having made the journey from agnostic to a follower of Christ would give me a unique perspective to teach from – how a freshly minted Christian came to know the Holy Spirit. The voice also told me that I wouldn’t have to rely on my limited experience alone. I could ask fellow Christians to share how the Holy Spirit works in their lives to get a broader perspective. And, as many of you whom I have asked know, I have done that. Some probably thought I was a pest because I was so persistent.
The voice also said that there is a great deal one can teach about the Holy Spirit. While we can know little or nothing about the Holy Spirit on our own, Scripture is rich in revelation about the Holy Spirit, and in addition there is a wealth of other resources such as commentaries, books, and CDs. Finally, one day Ginny Porterfield told me about a book, The Joy of Listening to God, by Joyce Huggett in which she advised, “if you believe God has told you to do something, ask Him to confirm it 3 times – through His Word, through circumstances and through others who may know nothing of the situation”. So I told 3 others at HCC whom I respect about my struggle and asked them what they thought I should do. All 3 gave me encouragement to teach the class. The voice which said to do the class continued to be relentless so I decided to go forward with this class.
I didn’t feel so alone in my struggle when I read that Francis Chan, an author of Christian books, went through a similar struggle when he wrote a book on the Holy Spirit. He wondered, and I quote, “how can any human being write well on the sacred topic of the Holy Spirit. No subject intimidates me more”. Yet he went on and wrote the book because he couldn’t think of anything more essential for God’s church, especially in the western hemisphere where it seems that the Holy Spirit is all but missing from most of our churches. Thus, he named his book, The Forgotten God. I’m glad he wrote the book. I learned a lot from it.
What will be covered here will be rooted in Scripture and also draw on testimony of a sizeable number of people on how the Spirit has works in their lives. While no human can explain the Holy Spirit because He is infinite and mysterious and cannot be fully known by us, we can endeavor to understand Him better by studying God’s Word, and from experiential knowledge. What I will be presenting will reflect my understanding at the point where I am in my journey.
I’d like to thank a number of people of who have been of immense help in preparing this material. First, those who answered my call to share how the Holy Spirit works in their lives. Many shared generously and I have pages upon pages of testimony that would take too long to present in their entirety, so I will weave excerpts from them into the class material. Second, Pastor Michael, Dale Kelley, and Bruce Farrington whom I have dialogued with at length about the topic. And finally, Jeanie Hagen who partnered with me in teaching the class.
The Trinity
A good place to start a discussion of the nature of the Holy Spirit is the Trinity, since the Holy Spirit is one of the persons of the Trinity. The Trinity is a core belief of the Christian religion. It is found in Christian creeds, e.g., the Apostles, Nicene and Athanasius creeds., The triune nature of God was first revealed to us by Jesus, but there are clues of it in the Old Testament. E.g., in Gen.1:26, it is written,
“Then God said, ‘Let us make man in our image, in our likeness’.”
Here, the plural pronouns are used and the Hebrew words used mean more than two. There are other places in the Old Testament where plural pronouns are used which refer to God. But it is in the New Testament where we learn that God is three persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, in one God. The Trinity was a mystery to the early church, and to a large extent is still shrouded in divine mystery. The word, Trinity, does not appear in the Bible. The term was coined in 215 AD by a church father named Tertullian. The first attempt to doctrinally define the Trinity was by the Nicene Council in 325 AD which used the Greek word, homoousious, to describe it. Homoousious means “of the same substance”, or of the same essence. God the Father, Lord Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit are all of the same substance. God is one What and three Whos. The triune nature of God sets the Christian faith apart from all other religions. We see our God as a loving, relational God. In light of this, a triune God makes more sense than a God who is a solitary person. Were God a solitary person, how would He know how to love, since before the Creation he would have been alone with no one to love. In fact, many things in our world, such as relationships, caring, family, community make more sense with a triune Creator who made us in His image. We should not look upon the Trinity as something strange. It is because of His triune nature that God wants a close, personal, loving relationship with us. It is due to the existence of the Trinity that there is a Holy Spirit to dwell within us. When we receive the Spirit, God is in us and we are in God, which makes for a relationship like no other.
Before we leave the topic of the Trinity, I would like to bring up the question, “where in Scripture is it written that Jesus is divine?” If the divinity of Christ is in question, the Trinity is in question. The question of where in Scripture it is written unequivocally that Jesus is divine is one of the questions I asked Christians when I was a non-believer. What would you answer if asked this question by a non-believer? Now let’s make the question more difficult. Where in Scripture is it written that Jesus is divine and at the same time reveals something about God that is in harmony with the Trinity?
The verses are among my favorites – John 1:1-2.
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God.”
This is such a beautiful, profound, and striking verse and so packed with revelation of the nature of God that it wouldn’t surprise me if God dictated it Himself. So let’s unpack them. Here, John is using the concept of Logos, the Greek for Word, to refer to Christ. In saying that Christ existed in the beginning means that he already existed at the beginning, i.e. he pre-existed the creation. Christian theology links pre-existence with eternality, one of the attributes of God.
This is the first assertion John makes about Christ in this verse. Let’s skip the second verse for a moment and go to the third. Here he says directly and unequivocally that Christ is God. So, with these two assertions, John is making it clear that Christ is divine.
Now, let’s go back to the second assertion, that Christ was with God; he says it again in the second verse. The key word here is “with”. In Greek, there are 3 words for “with”. The first is “sun”, which means to get together, to be “with” each other. The prefix,”syn” comes from this word. E.g., a synagogue is a place where Jews get together.
The second Greek word is “meta”. It means “with” in the sense of being alongside someone.
The third Greek word is “pros” and it is the most intimate of the 3. It conveys the meaning of being with someone in a face-to-face relationship. This is the Greek word John used in this passage. It conveys the idea that Christ enjoys a close, intimate, personal relationship with God. So John is distinguishing between Christ and God, yet we have that Christ is God. They are both the same, yet distinct from one another. Is that not in perfect harmony with the concept of the Trinity?
Who Is The Holy Spirit?
One thing that can definitely be said is that the Holy Spirit is not an “it”. The Holy Spirit is a person. All references to the Holy Spirit in Scripture are with a personal pronoun. It can also be said that the Holy Spirit is neither a “he” nor a “she”, although Scripture traditionally uses “He” in referring to the Holy Spirit. Unfortunately, there is no genderless personal pronoun in the English language (there is one in the Chinese language used exclusively for God). Since we all are made in the image of God, God must have traits of both men and women. When I discussed this with one of my friends, namely Bruce Farrington, he suggested that when God made male and female in His image, He gave the female more of His soft traits, such as compassion, and the male more of His hard traits, such as judgment. When a man and woman marry, God said the two become one, and in the union the traits come back together to become complete again. That is an appealing concept. As Bruce said, this gives the union of marriage a whole new meaning.
Next let’s ask the question, how do we know that the Holy Spirit is God? How do we know that He isn’t an agent or force of some kind sent by God to help us? There is only one way that we can know and that is if Scripture reveals to us that the Holy Spirit is God. And, fortunately it does so in abundance. Throughout Scripture the Holy Spirit is identified with God Himself. An example is in Acts 5. The story is familiar to most Christians. In the very early church led by the Apostles, all believers shared their possessions for the good of all. If they had property, they sold it and laid the proceeds at the feet of the Apostles to be distributed to anyone who had need. Acts 5 tells the story of Ananias and his wife, Sapphora, who had sold a piece of property but in this case they secretly held back part of the money and laid the rest at the feet of the Apostles. But Peter was not to be fooled. In verses 3 and 4 he addresses Ananias,
“Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land? Didn’t it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn’t the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied just to human beings but to God.”
Here, we see that a lie to the Holy Spirit is equated to a lie to God Himself. This tells us that the Holy Spirit is divine.
Other passages in the Bible affirm over and over that the Holy Spirit is a divine person and identify the Holy Spirit with God. Here are some examples. The expressions, “God said” and “The Holy Spirit or the Spirit said” are used interchangeably in many passages in Scripture. Also, many passages describe the Holy Spirit as possessing attributes or having authority which are associated with a divine being. In 1 Cor. 2: 10-11, Paul describes the Holy Spirit as an omniscient being.
“The Spirit searches all things, yes, the deep things of God. For what man knows the things of man except the Spirit of the man which is in him? Even so, no one knows the things of God except the Spirit of God”
So we see here that the Holy Spirit knows all that God knows and omniscience is an attribute of God so it must also be an attribute of the Holy Spirit.
In Ps. 139:7-8, the psalmist describes the Spirit as omnipresent.
“Where can I go from Your Spirit? Or where can I flee from Your presence? If I ascend into heaven, You are there: if I make my bed in the depths, You are there. If I rise on the wings of the dawn, if I settle on the far side of the sea, even there Your hand will guide me.
So, we see here that the Holy Spirit is to be found everywhere, in other words, He is omnipresent. No creature has this attribute, not even spiritual beings such as angels. Even Satan cannot be in two places at the same time.
Scripture also reveals that the Holy Spirit is omnipotent. He is described as being involved in special works that are of the kind that only God can perform, such as the work of creation and the work of redemption. Here are some examples. The first example is the first place that the Holy Spirit appears in the Bible, the first 2 verses in the Bible, Gen. 1:1-2.
“In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form, and void; and darkness fell over the surface of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.”
Here we see the Holy Spirit involved in creation. We usually think of creation as the work of God the Father and God the Son, but a close look at Scripture reveals that that the Spirit was also involved. Gen. 1 is but one example and some others will be mentioned later, but let’s first dig into these two verses in a bit more detail. There is a lot of revelation packed into these verses. One thing we learn is how the infant primordial earth looked, and it looked vastly different than the earth we know today. What science has recently discovered about how the infant earth looked is in harmony with what these verses reveal. We will return to this in a moment.
One question one might ask on reading this verse is, why is the Holy Spirit mentioned in these verses? We can be sure He is included for a very good reason. God doesn’t waste words in Scripture. And, it’s doubtful that it is simply an honorable mention in the creation process or that He was just along for the ride in the creation process. It is likely that it is because He was right in the middle of it all, deeply involved in the creation process. But how was He involved? What does it mean that He was “hovering over the face of the waters”? What imagery is God using here? What waters is Gen. referring to? We can answer the latter question from a passage in Job. Job, by the way, is loaded with information on creation. One passage tells us that the infant earth was completely covered with water, one global ocean. So the Spirit was hovering over this entire global ocean, or over the entire earth. Next we have to ask if the word “hovering” has any special meaning. The word is used in only one other passage in the Bible, in Deuteronomy, where it describes an eagle hovering over its chicks nurturing them in their growth and development to maturity. So, perhaps the verse means that the Spirit is nurturing the infant earth as God develops it from a primordial planet into a mature planet that can support the plants, animals, and mankind that He will create later.
Let’s look at how the infant earth appeared at the time described in Gen. 1. The heavens and the earth had been created. Since the earth was in place, the solar system was also in place. The Holy Spirit is now describing the earth and describing it from the perspective of an author on the surface of the earth. The earth is without form, which means it had a featureless surface. It is void; this is generally interpreted to mean it is void of life. And then, darkness falls over the earth. Incidentally, there is a companion verse in Jeremiah 4:23 which also speaks of darkness, but from the opposite perspective. In this verse, the Holy Spirit is speaking,
“I looked at the earth, and it was formless and empty; and at the heavens, and their light was gone.”
The formless and empty earth places the time precisely where the earth was in Gen.1:2. The Spirit is on the surface of the earth and looks up and the light from the heavens has disappeared; in other words, some event has occurred that has blocked out the light coming from the heavens and so darkness falls over the surface of the deep.
The fourth condition of the primordial earth that we mentioned earlier is that it is completely covered with a global ocean.
This is exactly the description modern science gives for the infant earth. The infant earth was formless because it had been molten on the surface, it was dark because a mantle of dust and dense steamy clouds around it blocked out all sunlight, it was completely covered with a global ocean, and it was void of life. We couldn’t have lived there because of the presence of a toxic atmosphere, high temperatures, and other conditions hostile to life. So, the Spirit is hovering over this infant earth and His task is to nurture and develop it into a mature planet which could support a Garden of Eden teeming with life, a home for Adam and Eve and mankind, much like the eagle cared for her chicks as they grew into mature eagles. Science knows fairly well the steps which the earth went through in this process from a primordial to a mature earth and they are in harmony with the order of steps described in the rest of the Gen. Creation story. I would love to go into the science of this process but don’t want to get off track from the topic of this class so let me return to the role of the Holy Spirit in creation. I will mention a couple of other examples of Scripture which tells us that the Holy Spirit was involved in creation. First, Ps. 104:30
“when you take away their breath, they die and return to the dust. You send forth your Spirit, they are created; and You renew the face of the earth”
This passage sounds as if it is describing the mass extinctions of life that are known by science to have occurred several times over the past 300 million years.
A second example is Job 33:4:
“The Spirit of God has made me, and the breath of the Almighty gives me life.”
So far, we have seen that the Holy Spirit is a person who is omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent, and a Creator. What else does Scripture tell us that teaches us that the Holy Spirit is a person? The Bible describes numerous acts of the Holy Spirit that identify Him as a person and not a force of some kind.
Rev. 2:7 tells us that He speaks:
”He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.”
Rom. 8:26 tells us that He intercedes:
“And in the same way the Spirit also helps our weakness: for we do not know how to pray as we should, but the Spirit Himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words”
John 15:26tells us that He testifies:
“When the Helper comes, who I will send to you from the Father, that is the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, He will bear witness of Me”
Rom. 8:24: tells us that He leads:
“For all who are being led by the Spirit of God, these are the sons of God.”
Acts 16:6 tells us that He commands:
“And they passed through the Phrygian and Galatian region, having been forbidden by the Holy Spirit to speak the word in Asia”
John 16:13 tells us that He guides:
“When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever He hears He will speak, and He will declare to you the things that are to come.”
We see here again that He speaks, and that He hears as well.
Acts 20:28 tells us that He appoints:
“Be on guard for yourselves and for all of the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood.”
Heb. 10:29 tells us that He can be insulted:
“How much severer punishment do you think he will deserve who has trampled underfoot the Son of God, and has regarded as unclean the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and has insulted the Spirit of grace?”
Matt. 12:31 tells us that He can be blasphemed:
“Therefore, I say to you, any sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven men, but blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven.”
Eph. 4:30 tells us that He can be grieved:
“And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.”
All of these verses teach us that the Holy Spirit has intellect, power, will, and emotions, all of which are attributes of a person. So the Bible makes it crystal clear to us that the Holy Spirit is a person.