The authors continue:
“. . . only some researchers have tried to connect the concepts of mind and brain through quantum aspects, and can explain part of mind’s features through quantum properties [and they cite Eccles’ and beck’s work which has been described extensively in my writings and is the foundation of my research]. . . . to preserve human’s free will, we need both causality, (which related to self-agency and refers to ‘will’), and mind’s freedom of choice (which refers to ‘free’). in physics, we chose the bohmian quantum mechanics, due to its causal description of events.” the authors describe “the incorporeity of mind, which leads to its non-temporality.” both terms are consistent with Ken samples’ description of god’s nature in the book, testable faith, which was cited in a previous blog post. god’s nature includes being uncaused, self-sustaining, atemporal, nonspatial, immaterial and personal. the mind of man was created in the imago dei (image of god), so it too has the property of causality and is nonspatial, immaterial, atemporal and personal. in my next blog i will add the authors’ discussion of their model of mind-brain interaction.